Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 FEBRUARY 2015

Uncertainty Exists Around Court's Stance On Duty To Defend

Lawsuits arising as a result of "slip and falls" are common. The situation often unfolds as follows: on a winter day, an individual slips and falls.

CanadaInsurance

Lawsuits arising as a result of "slip and falls" are common.  The situation often unfolds as follows: on a winter day, an individual slips and falls.  They sue both the property owner and the contractor responsible for performing winter maintenance at the location of the fall.  Counsel for the property owner, who is named as an 'additional insured' under the contractor's general liability insurance, writes to counsel for the contractor and demands that the insurer assume the defence of the property owner.

The demand is typically met with deafening silence.  At that point, counsel for the property owner, or any defendant in a similar position, must decide what steps to take.  One problem for counsel is that the courts are inconsistent in their response to this situation.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from