Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JULY 2014

The Court Of Appeal’s Most Recent Comment On Jurisdictional Issues

In Tamminga v. Tamminga [2014 ONCA 478], the Court of Appeal considered whether an Ontario resident, who was injured after falling off a truck in Alberta, could maintain a claim in Ontario. Both owners of the truck were located in Alberta.

CanadaInsurance

In Tamminga v. Tamminga [2014 ONCA 478], the Court of Appeal considered whether an Ontario resident, who was injured after falling off a truck in Alberta, could maintain a claim in Ontario. Both owners of the truck were located in Alberta. The Plaintiff also named her own automobile insurer in the claim pursuant to the uninsured/underinsured motorist provisions.

The issue before the Court of Appeal was whether Ms. Tamminga's own insurance contract was a "sufficient presumptive connecting factor" as considered by the Supreme Court of Canada in Club Resorts Ltd. v. Van Breda [2012 SCC 17], to permit an Ontario court to have jurisdiction over non-resident tortfeasors and torts.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from