Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 AUGUST 2021

Proposed Class Actions Against Insurers Fails

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

In a previous article, BLG wrote about proposed class actions brought against 15 auto insurers and the insurers' government regulator, the Financial Services Commission of Ontario...

CanadaInsurance

Court of Appeal confirms LAT to decide SABs Disputes

In a previous article, BLG wrote about proposed class actions brought against 15 auto insurers and the insurers' government regulator, the Financial Services Commission of Ontario (FSCO, now the Financial Services Regulatory Agency of Ontario), alleging the insurers were improperly deducting HST from the plaintiff's statutory accident benefits (SABs). The defendants subsequently brought a Rule 21 motion, which resulted in the Superior Court of Justice dismissing the claims against the insurers, holding that it lacked jurisdiction over the claims, which belonged to the License Appeal Tribunal (LAT). However, the claim against FSCO was allowed to proceed as the nature of the allegations fell outside the jurisdiction of the LAT.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from