Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 APRIL 2013

Penny "Unwise" And Pound Foolish: Punitive Damage Awards

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

A discussion on a recent case, where the Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan has sent a strong message to insurance companies, by setting new high-water marks for punitive damage awards.

CanadaInsurance

The Court of Queen’s Bench for Saskatchewan has sent a strong message to insurance companies in the recent Branco v American Home Assurance Co. decision by setting new high-water marks for punitive damage awards. After a comprehensive review of the jurisprudence on punitive damage awards and the specific behaviour of the insurers involved, Justice Acton held that insurance companies had not received the message sent by the Supreme Court of Canada in Whiten v. Pilot Insurance Co. Using very strong condemnatory language, Justice Acton stated the purpose of these higher awards was to “gain the attention of the insurance industry [so that it] … recognize the destruction and devastation that their actions cause in failing to honour their contractual policy commitments to the individuals insured.” 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from