Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 JULY 2016

Don't Get Caught Napping - Limitation Periods And Misnomer

Two recent Ontario decisions demonstrate the importance of investigating potential limitation period issues early and taking action from the outset.

CanadaInsurance

Two recent Ontario decisions demonstrate the importance of investigating potential limitation period issues early and taking action from the outset. In Stechyshyn v. Domljanovic, 2015 ONCA 889, the plaintiff obtained the driver's licence number, insurance information and license plate of other driver on the date of the accident (June 8, 2006) and provided this information to police. Plaintiff counsel was retained on June 6, 2008 and issued a claim on June 20, 2008 naming John Doe as the defendant driver. On January 5, 2010, plaintiff counsel requested a copy of the police report. Over 18 months later, on July 22, 2011, plaintiff counsel was provided with a copy of the police file which the plaintiff's insurer had obtained on a motion. This file identified the defendant driver and a motion was brought seeking to substitute the driver for John Doe. This motion was not opposed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from