Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 OCTOBER 2020

Do Ontario Insurance Laws Have Extraterritorial Effect?

In the case of Unifund Assurance Co. v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia, a family insured under an Ontario motor vehicle policy, issued by Unifund, ...

CanadaInsurance

Revisiting Unifund v ICBC in the 2020 case of Travellers v. CAA, 2020 ONCA 382

In the case of Unifund Assurance Co. v. Insurance Corp. of British Columbia, a family insured under an Ontario motor vehicle policy, issued by Unifund, was driving a rental car in British Columbia when they were struck by a tractor-trailer insured by ICBC under a British Columbia insurance policy. The insureds sued in British Columbia and were awarded $2.5 million. Unifund, in turn, brought suit against ICBC with reference to section 275 of Ontario's Insurance Act and sought to recover the benefits it had paid out to the family under the SABS.

The case went to the Supreme Court of Canada which found that Unifund could not rely on provisions of the Insurance Act to recover the benefits it had paid. In so doing, the Court explained that, based on the facts of this case, if an Ontario Act purported to regulate civil rights in British Columbia arising out of an accident in that province,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from