Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 FEBRUARY 2020

Trans Mountain Pipeline Approval Upheld Using New Standard Of Review Principles

Cassels
Cassels
Contributor
Cassels

Cassels

Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP is a Canadian law firm focused on serving the transaction, advocacy,...

View firm profile
Explore more from Cassels

On February 4, 2020, the Federal Court of Appeal in Coldwater Indian Band et al. v. Attorney General of Canada et al.1 considered whether to uphold the Order in Council approving the Trans Mountain Expansion Project.

CanadaGovernment, Public Sector

On February 4, 2020, the Federal Court of Appeal in Coldwater Indian Band et al. v. Attorney General of Canada et al.1 considered whether to uphold the Order in Council approving the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (Project) against claims that Canada had failed to appropriately consult and accommodate Indigenous concerns.

In upholding the authorization, the Court applied new principles from the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) for reviewing regulatory and Crown decisions, including decisions relating to the Crown's duty to consult. These principles, set out in a trilogy of SCC decisions released in December 2019, emphasize that deference must be given to Crown decision makers, who are to be evaluated on a standard of reasonableness. In particular, deference is owed to the decision maker where the Crown decision does not suffer from errors in reasoning or logical deficiencies, and where there is "a chain of reasoning progressing from a reasonable view of the evidence

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from