On February 4, 2020, the Federal Court of Appeal in
Coldwater Indian Band et al. v. Attorney General of Canada et
al.1 considered whether to uphold the Order in
Council approving the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (Project)
against claims that Canada had failed to appropriately consult and
accommodate Indigenous concerns.
In upholding the authorization, the Court applied new principles
from the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) for reviewing regulatory and
Crown decisions, including decisions relating to the Crown's
duty to consult. These principles, set out in a trilogy of SCC
decisions released in December 2019, emphasize that deference must
be given to Crown decision makers, who are to be evaluated on a
standard of reasonableness. In particular, deference is owed to the
decision maker where the Crown decision does not suffer from errors
in reasoning or logical deficiencies, and where there is "a
chain of reasoning progressing from a reasonable view of the
evidence