Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 OCTOBER 2014

Supreme Court Releases Decision In Keewatin

This claim began in 2005 by Grassy Narrows First Nation and trappers from the First Nation launching an action to have a forestry licence that was issued by Ontario set aside.

CanadaGovernment, Public Sector
Cathy Guirguis
Cathy Guirguis
Senwung Luk
Senwung Luk

The Supreme Court of Canada released its decision today in Grassy Narrows First Nation v. Ontario (Natural Resources), 2014 SCC 48 [referred to as Keewatin, in the courts below]. In a unanimous decision, the SCC dismissed the appeal and confirmed the Ontario Court of Appeal's decision that Ontario, not Canada, has the jurisdiction to take up land in Treaty 3.

The immediate reaction has been a lot of disappointment about the state of Canadian law that is reflected in this decision.

Background of the case

This claim began in 2005 by Grassy Narrows First Nation and trappers from the First Nation launching an action to have a forestry licence that was issued by Ontario set aside. The basis for that action was that the forestry licence violated Treaty 3 harvesting rights. The action was split into two parts. The first part to be determined included two questions: (1) does Ontario have the authority to take up tracts of land in what is referred to as the Keewatin

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from