Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 MAY 2025

B.C. Court Clarifies Limits On Forestry Licence Rights Amid Reconciliation And Ecosystem-Based Management Efforts

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

The British Columbia Supreme Court's decision in Teal Cedar v British Columbia provides new guidance as to the limited nature of rights that forest licences in British Columbia convey to the licensee.

CanadaGovernment, Public Sector

The British Columbia Supreme Court's decision in Teal Cedar v British Columbia1provides new guidance as to the limited nature of rights that forest licences in British Columbia convey to the licensee. The case also rejects novel arguments put forward respecting "partial constructive taking" where licenses may be affected in some way by changes to the regulatory landscape and confirms that an additional factor, reconciliation with Indigenous peoples, is indeed contemplated by B.C.'s forestry regime.

While the case explores many issues in expropriation law and the legal character of forest licences, questions remain to be answered in future cases as to the precise legal character of bodies established under government-to-government arrangements between Indigenous governments and the Crown.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from