Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 APRIL 2020

Supreme Court Defines Test For Characterizing Derivatives Transactions

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

On March 13, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in MacDonald v Canada which provides important guidance in determining whether a financial derivative...

CanadaFinance and Banking

On March 13, 2020, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in MacDonald v Canada1 which provides important guidance in determining whether a financial derivative is on income or capital account for the purposes of the Income Tax Act (Canada).

The issue was whether the taxpayer could deduct, as income losses, the cash settlement payments he made under a forward contract. This turned on whether the purpose of the forward contract was to hedge a financial risk or to speculate. If the forward contract were a hedge, gains or losses from the forward contract would derive their character from the underlying asset hedged. Conversely, if the forward contract were a speculation, the gains or losses would be on income account.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from