Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 05 JANUARY 2010

Low Threshold For Leave To Proceed In Claim For Secondary Market Misrepresentation

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

On December 14, 2009, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice granted leave for the plaintiffs in Silver et al. v. IMAX Corporation to proceed with a claim under the secondary market disclosure civil liability provisions of the Ontario "Securities Act". The court concurrently issued its decision certifying the action as a class proceeding.

CanadaFinance and Banking

On December 14, 2009, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice granted leave for the plaintiffs in Silver et al. v. IMAX Corporation to proceed with a claim under the secondary market disclosure civil liability provisions of the Ontario Securities Act. The court concurrently issued its decision certifying the action as a class proceeding.

Leave To Proceed

This decision is the first to interpret the requirement under section 138.8 of the Ontario Securities Act for a plaintiff to obtain leave of the court before commencing an action for misrepresentations in a reporting issuer's public disclosure.

In order to grant leave, the court must be satisfied that:

  • the action is being brought in good faith; and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from