Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 MAY 2021

Lessons For Lenders: Personal Knowledge And Addressing The Evidentiary Burden Remains Key

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

It is common for a special loans officer of a secured lender to swear an Affidavit on behalf of their financing institution in connection with enforcement proceedings.

CanadaFinance and Banking

Introduction

It is common for a special loans officer of a secured lender to swear an Affidavit on behalf of their financing institution in connection with enforcement proceedings. However, a recent Master's decision, Meridian OneCap Credit Corp v Nikos Directional Inc, 2021 ABQB 362, from the Alberta Court of Queen's Bench raises the question of what affidavit evidence and testimony is needed and can be relied on for an Application for Summary Judgment.

Background

The Plaintiff, Meridian OneCap Credit Corp., brought an Application for Summary Judgment which was heard by a Master in chambers. The Application for Summary Judgment was with respect to two equipment leases (the "Leases") alleged to be entered into between First Capital Leasing Ltd. as lessor (the "Lessor"), Nikos Directional Inc. (the "Company") and Nicolae Neacsu (the "Individual") as lessees. By way of Affidavit evidence submitted by the secured lender (the "Plaintiff"), it was submitted that

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from