Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 JULY 2020

Economic Loss And Allegedly Flawed Financial Product

Ordinarily, if a person or corporation suffers pure economic harm, the remedy is a claim for breach of contract.

CanadaFinance and Banking

Ordinarily, if a person or corporation suffers pure economic harm, the remedy is a claim for breach of contract. This places the wronged party in the same financial position as if the contract had been performed. But if there is no contract between the parties and a plaintiff suffers only economic harm, without injury to their person or property, what is the remedy?

For years, Canadian courts have sought to limit when a party may rely on tort law to claim pure economic loss. Adopting a "rights-based" approach to tort, the courts have embraced the principle that tort law compensates rights like damage to personal security or property, not harm to pure economic interests.

A recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal, Wright v. Horizons ETFS Management (Canada) Inc. 2020 ONCA 337, however, may have expanded the scope of recovery for economic loss under negligence law. Wright introduces a potentially novel claim for financial harm arising from the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from