Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 OCTOBER 2007

Banker Beware - Joint Operating Agreements And Trust Funds

Bankers to the oil and gas industry should be wary of applying customer’s funds held in accounts with the bank against obligations owed to the bank where the customer is known to be an “Operator” under a Joint Operating Agreement.

CanadaFinance and Banking
David LeGeyt
David LeGeyt
David Mann
David Mann
Author LinkedIn connections

Bankers to the oil and gas industry should be wary of applying customer’s funds held in accounts with the bank against obligations owed to the bank where the customer is known to be an "Operator" under a Joint Operating Agreement and where the possibility exists that those funds are impressed with a trust in favour of non-operators.

Funds Held By An Operator Are Trust Funds

In Bank of Nova Scotia v. Societe General (Canada) (1988) 87 A.R. 133, the Court of Appeal of Alberta considered the nature of the relationship between an operator of certain oil and gas properties and the non-operators who each had a specifically defined interest in those properties. The non-operators alleged that the operator stood in a fiduciary relationship to them and that it held funds on deposit in its general account in trust for the benefit of the non-operators. The relationship between the two parties was governed by a 1981 CAPL agreement. The Court of Appeal concluded that under the terms of the 1981

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from