Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 MARCH 2025

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Turning Up The Heat: Groundbreaking Climate Litigation In Europe And Canada

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

In 2024, Europe's highest human rights court found that the Swiss government violated the rights of its citizens by failing to do enough to combat climate change.

CanadaEnvironment

In 2024, Europe's highest human rights court found that the Swiss government violated the rights of its citizens by failing to do enough to combat climate change. The case, Verein KlimaSeniorinnen Schweiz and others v. Switzerland ("KlimaSeniorinnen"), is the first instance of a court finding that climate inaction violates human rights. KlimaSeniorinnen underscores the potential for human rights law to be used as a tool to hold governments accountable for their climate policies.

Hinting to the possibility of similar developments in Canada, the Ontario Court of Appeal took a significant step in the development of climate-related litigation. In Mathur v. Ontario, the Court of Appeal for Ontario clarified that climate-related issues can be challenged in court and clarified the analytical framework for doing so on the bases of Sections 7 and 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (the "Charter").1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from