Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JANUARY 2014

Ecojustice Lawsuit Triggers Pesticide Reviews

Last August, counsel at EcoJustice, on behalf of clients Equiterre and the David Suzuki Foundation, filed a lawsuit alleging that the Minister of Health and the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) acted unlawfully when they refused to review (reconsider) the approval of pest-control products containing three allegedly environmentally risky pesticides, specifically chlorthal-dimethyl, trifuralin and trichlorfon.

CanadaEnvironment

Last August, counsel at EcoJustice, on behalf of clients Equiterre and the David Suzuki Foundation, filed a lawsuit alleging that the Minister of Health and the Pest Management Regulatory Agency (PMRA) acted unlawfully when they refused to review  (reconsider) the approval of pest-control products containing three allegedly environmentally risky pesticides, specifically chlorthal-dimethyl, trifuralin and trichlorfon. The lawsuit also claimed unreasonable delay in responding to requests to review 26 other pesticides.

In response, on December 30, 2013, the PMRA announced that it will initiate special pesticide reviews of 23 of the active ingredients that are the subject of the litigation. Reviews are required if an active ingredient is prohibited for health or environmental reasons in an OECD country.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from