Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 JULY 2026

Director And Officer Liability For Environmental Offences

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

The British Columbia Court of Appeal has ruled that directors and officers can face personal criminal liability for environmental offences committed by their corporations based on control rather than knowledge.

CanadaEnvironment

Explore other chapters in the Mining Disputes Insights Series 2026.

Key takeaways

  • Directors, officers, and agents can be criminally liable for environmental offences committed by their corporations under “secondary liability” provisions — even without knowledge of the underlying offence.
  • Courts will focus on control, not awareness or intent, when assessing individual liability in regulatory regimes.
  • Participation in highly regulated industries such as mining carries heightened personal legal risk, making due diligence and active oversight critical safeguards.

Why this matters

The British Columbia Court of Appeal’s decision confirms that directors and officers can face personal criminal liability for environmental offences committed by their corporations — even without knowledge of the underlying conduct. For participants in highly regulated industries such as mining, the ruling reinforces that control, not awareness, is the key driver of exposure, making active oversight

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from