Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JULY 2016

Update: Stewart Estate v TAQA North Ltd, The Finale

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

In November 2015, the Alberta Court of Appeal issued its decision in Stewart Estate v TAQA North Ltd, 2015 ABCA 357, which addressed a number of issues significant to the oil and gas industry.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

In November 2015, the Alberta Court of Appeal issued its decision in Stewart Estate v TAQA North Ltd, 2015 ABCA 357, which addressed a number of issues significant to the oil and gas industry. We previously commented on this decision. In January 2016, ExxonMobil Canada Ltd. ("Exxon"), Nexen Inc. ("Nexen"), Bonavista Energy Corporation ("Bonavista"), Coastal Resources Limited ("Coastal") and Pengrowth Energy Corporation, as successor to Esprit Exploration Ltd. ("Esprit/Pengrowth"), filed applications with the Supreme Court of Canada (docket number 36810), for leave to appeal the decision in Stewart Estate v TAQA North Ltd, 2015 ABCA 357, citing the need for clarification of:

  1. the proper measure of damages in mineral trespass cases;

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from