Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 MARCH 2016

American Creek Resources Ltd. v. Teuton Resources Corp., 2015 BCCA 170

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

This British Columbia Court of Appeal decision involves the contractual interpretation of the phrase "exploration expenditures" within an option agreement.

CanadaEnergy and Natural Resources

American Creek Resources Ltd. v. Teuton Resources Corp., 2015 BCCA 170

This British Columbia Court of Appeal decision involves the contractual interpretation of the phrase "exploration expenditures" within an option agreement.

Teuton and American Creek had an option agreement related to property in north-western B.C. Under the agreement, American Creek would earn a controlling interest in the property upon completion of certain conditions, including spending at least $5 million on "exploration expenditures". While American Creek said it spent over $6 million on exploration expenditures, Teuton challenged certain expenditures as not being reasonable, and refused to complete the transfer.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from