Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 OCTOBER 2008

"Wronko" And Changes To Pensions And Other Post-Employment Benefits

In "Wronko", the Ontario Court of Appeal determined that an employee was not bound by two years’ notice of a fundamental change to his terms of employment.

CanadaEmployment and HR

In Wronko1, the Ontario Court of Appeal determined that an employee was not bound by two years' notice of a fundamental change to his terms of employment.

The decision was based on the specific facts and the ongoing interaction of employee and employer. The employee was an executive with 17 years service who had negotiated an employment contract with the president of the employer that provided two years' salary on termination. A new president was appointed who attempted to reduce the termination entitlement from two years' pay to 30 weeks' pay. The employee objected to the change and, on several occasions, refused to sign an amended contract. Two years' notice of a change to the termination entitlement was given. After expiry of the two years' notice, the employee was again asked to sign an amended contract and it was noted that if the employee did not accept the amended terms "we do not have a job for you".

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from