Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MARCH 2025

When Are Workplace Investigation Reports Protected By Solicitor-Client Privilege?

In Starrs v. Troczynski, 2024 BCSC 2267 (Starrs), the plaintiff sought a production order against his former employer, Heidelberg Materials Canada Limited (HMC), for a workplace investigation report (the Report).

CanadaEmployment and HR

Case summary

In Starrs v. Troczynski, 2024 BCSC 2267 (Starrs), the plaintiff sought a production order against his former employer, Heidelberg Materials Canada Limited (HMC), for a workplace investigation report (the Report). The investigation was initiated in response to the plaintiff's alleged breaches of HMC's drug and alcohol policy. HMC's in-house counsel had directed a third party, Integrated Risk Investigations Security Solutions Corp. (the Investigator), to undertake the investigation and prepare the Report. HMC's in-house counsel had then provided a copy of the Report to its external employment counsel in connection with seeking their legal advice about the possibility of terminating the plaintiff's employment.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from