Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JUNE 2024

When An E-Mail Does Not "Find You Well": Just Cause Termination Not A Proportionate Response To Employee's Heated E-Mail

Employers can be quick to assert that a single instance of employee misconduct is enough to discharge an employee for just cause.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Previously printed in the LexisNexis Labour Notes Newsletter.

Employers can be quick to assert that a single instance of employee misconduct is enough to discharge an employee for just cause.

However, in the recent decision of Lefebvre v. Gisborne Holdings Ltd., 2023 BCSC 2231, we see that moving too quickly to discharge an employee for cause can have negative financial consequences for employers – particularly where the underlying fixed-term employment agreement does not provide for fixed notice on termination without cause.

Background

The defendant hired the plaintiff under a contract for fixed-term employment in order to cover a parental leave. The contract provided, among other things, for an 18-month term of employment from May 2, 2022 to October 27, 2023 and a completion bonus of $5,000 to be paid to the plaintiff on the earlier of two dates: the date of layoff or October 27, 2023. There would be no payment of the completion bonus to the plaintiff in

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from