Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 JULY 2014

What’s Cause Got To Do With It?

At times, employers despair at the perceived narrowing of the requirements of just cause for termination.

CanadaEmployment and HR

At times, employers despair at the perceived narrowing of the requirements of just cause for termination. With many adjudicators focused on progressive discipline, summarily dismissing an employee, even for serious misconduct, requires caution and often a well-researched legal opinion.

However, there is some conduct that is simply beyond the pale. Two recent decisions from the Courts of Appeal in British Columbia and Alberta provide reassurance that for outrageous conduct, employers can still dismiss employees before they do more harm.

1) No, you can't buy drugs from your subordinate

In British Columbia, the case of Van den Boogaard v Vancouver Pile Driving concerned a project manager at a marine general contractor. The employee was in charge of the safety of a job site in a safety-sensitive industry. His employment was terminated without cause.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from