Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 JANUARY 2025

Understanding Employer Duties: A Case Study On Workplace Accommodation And Termination

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the "Tribunal") recently considered the delicate balance between accommodating employees with disabilities and managing performance issues.

CanadaEmployment and HR

The Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario (the "Tribunal") recently considered the delicate balance between accommodating employees with disabilities and managing performance issues. The decision Karim v Workplace Safety and Insurance Board1 serves as a valuable reminder for employers navigating the complexities of workplace accommodations and termination decisions.

What Happened?

The employee alleged discrimination based on disability after being terminated during their probationary period.

The independent medical consultant neither endorsed the employee's work-from-home request nor found medical justification for the frequent absences. On December 12, 2019, following the independent medical review, the employee was terminated due to performance deficiencies and culpable absenteeism.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from