Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 OCTOBER 2014

The First Step To Maximizing DC Plan Value Is To Understand The Problem (Part I)

We will first examine various ways in which the "traditional" accumulation driven DC plan design fails to maximize value.

CanadaEmployment and HR

These days when people who work in the pension industry talk about the various options available to develop an effective pension risk management strategy, they are fond of pointing out that when it comes to looking at the range of plan design options, the discussion is about a lot more than traditional defined benefit (DB) verses defined contribution (DC) arrangements. Increasingly, plan sponsors are expressing interest in considering target benefit/shared risk plan (TBP) alternatives to the extent such arrangements are, or appear soon to be, authorized under enabling legislation in their pension jurisdiction.

The legislative changes to date to accommodate TBP alternatives should be applauded – in the right circumstances, conversion to a TBP can be beneficial for all stakeholders involved. (For more information on TBPs, see our prior posts: "The ABC's of Target Benefit Plans" Part I, Part II and Part III, and "C.D. Howe Paper: Target Benefit Plans in Canada – An

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from