Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 APRIL 2017

Slow And Steady, Crown Wasn't Ready - OHSA Charges Stayed Due To Delay

In July of 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada revamped the framework around an accused person's right to a speedy trial in the case R v. Jordan.

CanadaEmployment and HR

In July of 2016 the Supreme Court of Canada revamped the framework around an accused person's right to a speedy trial in the case R v. Jordan. Corporations are considered persons at law and they too have the right to be tried in a reasonable time pursuant to section 11(b) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The new framework set out a presumptive ceiling of 18 months for trial in provincial court and 30 months for trial in the superior court. Once the ceiling is exceeded then the delay is presumed to be unreasonable and the onus is on the Crown to rebut the presumption. A more detailed explanation can be found in another CCP blog here.

Since the decision in Jordan, lower courts have begun to apply the new framework, and in a very recent case charges were stayed against a company due to a 55-month delay. Charges pursuant to the Occupational Health and Safety Act were laid against Stephenson's Rental Services following a workplace fatality on November

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from