Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 24 JULY 2013

Non-Pension Post-Retirement Benefits – The GM Case

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

Non-pension post-retirement benefits are an increasingly expensive benefit for employers and a benefit that is highly valued by employees.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Non-pension post-retirement benefits (commonly referred to as "OPEB Benefits") are an increasingly expensive benefit for employers and a benefit that is highly valued by employees. As such, employers are increasingly looking to make changes to these benefits in order to control their benefits costs. OPEB Benefits typically are not funded, but rather usually are provided on a "pay as you go" basis. There is scope for making changes to OPEB Benefits, for both current employees and retired employees, provided that the contractual language so permits.

On July 17, 2013, the Superior Court of Justice (Ontario) released its decision in O'Neill v. General Motors of Canada Limited. In this case, General Motors of Canada Limited ("GM") decided to scale back health and life insurance benefits for certain non-union salaried employees who had retired between January 1, 1995 and October 20, 2011 (the "Class"). The Class took issue with these changes, and brought an action against

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from