Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 JUNE 2024

Non-Competition In Quebec: Employers Should Precisely Define Prohibited Work In Employment Contracts

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

The Superior Court recently issued a significant warning to employers operating in Québec regarding the drafting of non-competition covenants included in employment contracts...

CanadaEmployment and HR

The Superior Court recently issued a significant warning to employers operating in Québec regarding the drafting of non-competition covenants included in employment contracts: it is a best practice to clearly define the type of prohibited work in these clauses. Failure to do so may result in the non-competition covenant being deemed abusive when seeking enforcement before the Court. In such cases, the employer risks being ordered to pay the employee's legal fees.

Case Analysis: Jutras c. La Presse (2018) inc., 2023 QCCS 2506

In Jutras c. La Presse (2018) inc. ("La Presse")1, the Superior Court not only ruled that the non‑competition clause was invalid because of its lack of specificity regarding the activities targeted by the clause, but also ordered the employer to reimburse nearly $200,000 in legal fees for having requested its enforcement.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from