Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 25 JULY 2012

Mandatory Retirement For Law Partners

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

A partner is a partner and cannot be an employee of the partnership.

CanadaEmployment and HR

A partner is a partner and cannot be an employee of the partnership.  That decision came today from the BC Court of Appeal in the Fasken Martineau case.

The decision is of great interest to law firms of course, and to other partnerships.  But it is also important for employers generally.  It helps to better understand who is and is not an employee entitled to human rights protections.

The case began when Mitch McCormick, a long time partner of Fasken Martineau in Vancouver, challenged the mandatory retirement provisions of his partnership agreement.  The firm asked the BC Human Rights Tribunal to dismiss the case on the basis that McCormick was a partner, not an employee, and therefore not covered by the Human Rights Code.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from