Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 AUGUST 2022

LaFleche v. NLFD Auto: Managing Employee's Return To Work Is Employer's Responsibility

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault LLP provides a broad range of legal services, delivering strategic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

The recent decision of LaFleche v. NLFD Auto dba Prince George Ford (No. 2), 2022 BCHRT 88, highlights the careful approach that employers should take when employees are returning to work after a leave of absence.

CanadaEmployment and HR

The recent decision of LaFleche v. NLFD Auto dba Prince George Ford (No. 2),  2022 BCHRT 88, highlights the careful approach that employers should take when employees are returning to work after a leave of absence.

In this case, involving an employee seeking to return to work after her maternity leave, the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal (the "Tribunal") found that the employer had discriminated against her on the basis of sex and family status, contrary to section 13 of the British Columbia Human Rights Code (the "Code") and had constructively dismissed the employee by continuing to employ her replacement, failing to return her to her past position, and failing to communicate with her about her return to work.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from