Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 JULY 2018

Further Clarification On Mitigation Earnings And Deduction From Damages

The Michaels v. Red Deer College decision of the Supreme Court of Canada from 1976 held that employees pursuing wrongful dismissal damages have a duty to mitigate their damages.

CanadaEmployment and HR

The Michaels v. Red Deer College decision of the Supreme Court of Canada from 1976 held that employees pursuing wrongful dismissal damages have a duty to mitigate their damages.  Mitigation earnings reduce the liability of the employer for damages during the notice period to the extent of those earnings.  But what if the terminated employee had another job prior to his or her termination of employment, which allowed them to earn income during the notice period?

As employee counsel, this comes up frequently.  The employee who moonlights in real estate is a classic example.  Often there are negotiations around how that mitigation income will be treated and what thresholds to apply because in principal, we know that the income which would have been earned even if the employee continued to be employed should not be deducted.  We also know that if the employee takes up a full time career in real estate after the loss of his or her day job, then those earnings cannot all

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from