In Ontario, employers continue to have uncertainty regarding the
extent of their legal obligations when accommodating an
employee's family status responsibilities. The human rights
landscape in Ontario has been fraught with differing legal
standards and understandings of what an employer's legal
obligations are regarding family status accommodation.
The recent decision, Simpson v Pranajen Group Ltd. o/a
Nimigon Retirement Home, 2019 HRTO 10,
("Simpson") did not clarify the legal test for
family status accommodation, but has provided some additional
considerations for employers when assessing family status
accommodation requests.
In the Simpson decision, the employee was a personal
support worker in a retirement home. The employee's eldest
child was autistic, and it was essential for a caregiver to be at
the employee's home when the school bus dropped the child off
after school. The employee was the only family member available to
be at home during the drop-off.