Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 DECEMBER 2017

Collective Agreements May Prevail Over Some Bill 148 Scheduling Provisions

Although this new three-hour rule comes into effect on January 1, 2019, employers of unionized workforces may be able to delay its implementation.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Those of you who have been following this series of blogs will know that Bill 148 ESA amendments generally apply to unionized workplaces as of the effective date of the particular amendment. There are a few limited exceptions, however.

In yesterday's post, we addressed how employers with unionized employees may find temporary relief from the Bill 148 "equal pay for equal work" amendments.

In this post we explain the three circumstances in which a collective agreement in effect on January 1, 2019 may temporarily prevail over corresponding on-call and scheduling provisions in Bill 148.

1. Minimum pay for being on call (ESA section 21.4)

Under Bill 148, when an employee who is on call is not required to work, or is required to work but works less than three hours, the employer must pay the employee wages equal to at least three hours at his or her regular rate. An exception applies if the employer required the employee to be on call for the purposes of ensuring

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from