Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 OCTOBER 2026

Alberta Court Confirms Strict Screening Approach To Human Rights Complaints

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault LLP provides a broad range of legal services, delivering strategic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

The Alberta Court of King's Bench recently examined the intersection of human rights complaints and grievance arbitration in unionized workplaces, addressing critical questions about limitation periods, concurrent jurisdiction, and procedural fairness. When a unionized employee filed a human rights complaint after being told her position was no longer available during medical leave, the Commission initially proceeded with the complaint before later dismissing it on multiple grounds. The Court's decision cla

CanadaEmployment and HR

The Alberta Court of King’s Bench in Haynes v. Alberta (Human Rights Commission and Tribunal), 2026 ABKB 575 (“Haynes”), recently reinforced two important principles in employment and human rights law: limitation periods matter, and unionized employees should pursue human rights complaints through the grievance process.

At the same time, the Court recognized that a complainant’s reliance on the human rights process may limit the Alberta Human Rights Commission's ability to later dismiss a complaint in favour of the grievance process. Where the Commission has proceeded on the basis of concurrent jurisdiction, it may be unreasonable to do so if the complainant has relied on that approach and the opportunity to pursue another remedy has passed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from