Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 FEBRUARY 2020

Challenges To Benefit Plan Distinctions

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

As discussed at our last A.M. Pension Webinar in December 2019, following the 2018 decision of the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal in Talos v. Grand Erie District School Board ("Talos"),...

CanadaEmployment and HR

As discussed at our last A.M. Pension Webinar in December 2019, following the 2018 decision of the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal in Talos v. Grand Erie District School Board ("Talos"), employees and unions continue to challenge age-based distinctions in benefit plans. In this post, we highlight two such cases from late 2019 and briefly review the decision in Talos.

Talos v. Grand Erie District School Board

As discussed in our December 18, 2018 post, in 2018, the Ontario Human Rights Tribunal (the "Ontario Tribunal") considered whether or not Mr. Talos had experienced discrimination on the basis of age, in violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms ("Charter"), because his employer had terminated his health, dental and life insurance benefits at age 65 even though he continued to work. In a May 2018 interim decision, the Ontario Tribunal found that Mr. Talos' rights under the equality provision of the Charter were unjustifiably infringed by

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from