Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 JULY 2013

Can Employment Contracts Be Airtight? - Avoiding Common Pitfalls

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
Contributor
Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

With over 750 lawyers, intellectual property agents and other professionals, BLG services...

View firm profile
Explore more from Borden Ladner Gervais LLP

In recent years, written offer letters and employment contracts have become much more common.

CanadaEmployment and HR
Editors: Jennifer M. Fantini and Naomi E. Calla


In recent years, written offer letters and employment contracts have become much more common. Employers and employees typically agree that reducing essential terms and conditions to writing ensures certainty both during the employment relationship and at the time of termination, and reduces the likelihood of costly litigation.

In order for an employment contract to be enforceable, it must contain the essential elements of a contract: an offer by the employer, acceptance by the employee, and consideration. Consideration consists of a benefit flowing in both directions (at its most basic level, the employee provides services, and in exchange is paid compensation). In addition, employment contracts must comply with the minimum requirements of the Employment Standard Act, 2000 (the "ESA"), or other applicable employment standards legislation. For example, employers cannot contract to provide less than minimum ESA

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from