Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 SEPTEMBER 2016

Bender: No Discrimination Based On Sex Or Family Status

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

Employers whose workforce accrue seniority based on days actually worked will want to take note of a recent employment decision which considered allegations of discrimination based on sex and family status.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Employers whose workforce accrue seniority based on days actually worked will want to take note of a recent employment decision by the Human Rights Tribunal of Ontario ("HRTO") which considered allegations of discrimination based on sex (including pregnancy) and family status.

In Bender v. Limestone District School Board, an educational assistant alleged that her employer's practice of calculating seniority on the basis of time worked as a casual employee was discriminatory because it effectively excluded her time on maternity leave. The complaint was dismissed by the Vice Chair on the ground that all casual employees who became permanent employees were not credited seniority when they were unavailable for work, regardless of the reason for the unavailability.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from