Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 NOVEMBER 2012

BC Human Rights Tribunal Awards Costs Against Complainant

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault LLP provides a broad range of legal services, delivering strategic and...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

Employers are often frustrated by the fact that the BC Human Rights Tribunal rarely awards costs, even when an employee or former employee brings a frivolous complaint.

CanadaEmployment and HR

Employers are often frustrated by the fact that the BC Human Rights Tribunal rarely awards costs, even when an employee or former employee brings a frivolous complaint.

In Edwards v. Schnitzer Steel Pacific, the Tribunal accepted the employer's submissions that the complainant should pay costs for resiling from a settlement agreement.

Edwards agreed to settle his complaint in a tribunal-assisted mediation at which he was represented by counsel. The next day, he changed his mind.  He refused to withdraw his complaint as agreed, and tried to proceed to a hearing. The employer applied to dismiss the complaint on the basis that a settlement had been reached, and also asked for costs. In response, Edwards claimed duress, that his lawyer was unprepared for the mediation, and that he misunderstood the settlement. He also leveled unsupported allegations of criminal conduct, bad faith, forgery and fraud against the employer, and asked for costs against the Employer.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from