Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 MAY 2022

Anti-Climactic Appellate Ruling Declines To Interpret IDEL

In an anti-climactic ruling released May 12, 2022, the Ontario Court of Appeal has returned to the courts below the question of whether an (alleged) infectious disease emergency leave ("IDEL")...

CanadaEmployment and HR

In an anti-climactic ruling released May 12, 2022, the Ontario Court of Appeal has returned to the courts below the question of whether an (alleged) infectious disease emergency leave (“IDEL”), pursuant to the Ontario Employment Standards Act, 2000 (the “ESA”), may nevertheless trigger a constructive dismissal under the common law.

In April 2021, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice ruled in Coutinho v Ocular Health Centre Ltd. (“Coutinho”) that a layoff implemented for reasons related to COVID-19, which was thus “deemed” by the ESA to be a statutorily protected IDEL, was nonetheless still a layoff for common law purposes that may trigger constructive dismissal.  Barely two months later, a different judge of the same court released a contrary decision in Taylor v Hanley Hospitality (“Taylor”), which was a summary judgement ruling dismissing the plaintiff's claim (i.e., without a trial), in which the court also expressly held that Coutinho was wrongly decided and

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from