Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JULY 2019

The Total Fraud Test is Still Alive

The Supreme Court's recent decision in Christine DeJong Medicine Professional Corporation v. DBDC Spadina Ltd. (DBDC Spadina)

CanadaCriminal Law

The Supreme Court's recent decision in Christine DeJong Medicine Professional Corporation v. DBDC Spadina Ltd. (DBDC Spadina) clarified the law regarding whether corporations are civilly liable for the fraudulent actions of their director or officer. Ultimately, a corporation will be liable for the fraud of a director or officer if the actions 1) were designed or completed to the benefit or partial benefit of the corporation; and 2) the actions were done in the scope of the director or officer's authority.

The Facts

In this case, the Christine DeJong Medicine Professional Corporation ("DeJong PC") and DBDC Spadina Ltd. ("DBDC") had both been defrauded as victims of real estate fraud at the hands of Norma and Ronauld Walton. The Waltons convinced the victims to invest with them equally in corporations for the purpose of buying, renovating, and maintaining commercial real estate properties in Toronto. The Waltons did not invest funds of their own, instead moving the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from