Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 MARCH 2018

Reduction In Sanction On The Basis Of Delay Is Not Automatic

The Law Society of Upper Canada v Abbott, 2017 ONCA 525, holds that delay in initiating investigatory and disciplinary proceedings does not necessarily justify a reduction in sanction.

CanadaCriminal Law

The Law Society of Upper Canada v Abbott, 2017 ONCA 525, holds that delay in initiating investigatory and disciplinary proceedings does not necessarily justify a reduction in sanction. 

Mr. Abbott was a real estate lawyer. In 2007, a lender client, suspicious of mortgage fraud in one of Mr. Abbott's transactions, made a complaint about Mr. Abbott to the Law Society of Upper Canada. The investigation into the complaint was completed in 2012, more than five and a half years after the complaint was made. The hearing took place in 2014, approximately seven and a half years after the complaint was made. 

The hearing panel determined that Mr. Abbott engaged in mortgage fraud and ordered that his license to practice law be revoked. The appeal panel subsequently upheld the hearing panel's finding of professional misconduct. However, pointing to the Law Society's "inordinate and unacceptable delay" in investigating and prosecuting Mr. Abbott, the appeal panel reduced the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from