Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 04 SEPTEMBER 2026

When Should You Conduct An Internal Investigation?

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

Organizations face critical decisions when allegations of misconduct surface. Understanding when to launch an internal investigation—and when to hold off—requires careful judgment about triggers, risks, and the consequences of action or inaction. This practical guide examines the signals that warrant investigation, the situations where alternative responses may be more appropriate, and the strategic considerations that should shape your approach from the outset.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law
Tim Lawson
Tim Lawson
Shane D'Souza
Shane D'Souza
Andrew Matheson
Andrew Matheson
Author LinkedIn connections

Internal investigations help organizations identify, contain, and address risk. But launching one requires the exercise of judgment and has consequences of its own: scope creep, business disruption, confidentiality challenges, and a process that may itself come under scrutiny.

Over the next five weeks, our Investigations Group is sharing practical insights. We begin where every investigation starts: common triggers, situations where another response may serve better, and the considerations that shape scope from day one.

When Should you Conduct an Internal Investigation?

Not every complain warrants one. Knowing which ones do is where the real judgment lies.

Clear triggers

An investigation should be considered where there is:

  • Evidence of serious misconduct
  • A criminal or regulatory investigation
  • A whistleblower allegation
  • A formal complaint
  • Litigation – actual or threatened

Signals worth acting on

Consider an investigation to proactively address:

  • Shifting regulatory expectations
  • New enforcement activity or settlements
  • International developments reaching your regulators
  • Media scrutiny or allegations involving third parties
  • Emerging compliance concerns

When to hold off

An investigation may not be the right call where:

  • The complaint is clearly without merit
  • The issue is isolated and immaterial
  • The matter was recently investigated

Holding is a decision. Document it.

The upside

A well-executed investigation can help organizations:

  • Assess legal and regulatory risk
  • Meet stakeholder expectations
  • Identify control or governance gaps
  • Strengthen compliance measures
  • Protect employees, culture, and reputation

The risks

Once you begin, you’ll have to manager expanding scope and timelines, confidentiality, business disruption, employee morale, cost, and the investigation process itself coming under scrutiny.

The decision to investigate is only the first decision.

The bottom line

The question is not only whether to investigate. It is whether you can defend your decision.

To view the original article click here

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from