Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 SEPTEMBER 2017

Third Party Litigation Funding Of Class Actions In Ontario: "A Work In Progress"

In the most recent Ontario decision on third-party litigation financing, Justice Perell provides further guidance concerning the circumstances in which such funding arrangements will receive court approval.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

In the most recent Ontario decision on third-party litigation financing, Justice Perell provides further guidance concerning the circumstances in which such funding arrangements will receive court approval.

In Houle v. St. Jude Medical Inc., 2017 ONSC 5129, Bentham IMF Capital Inc. (Bentham), an Australian-based litigation financing firm, entered into a financing agreement with Mr. and Mrs. Houle, plaintiffs in a proposed class action alleging negligent manufacture and distribution of implantable cardiac defibrillators and failure to warn of rapid, premature battery depletion.

Pursuant to the agreement, Bentham committed to pay, on a non-recourse basis:

  1. the disbursements incurred by class counsel up to a prescribed amount, after which amount class counsel would fund the disbursements;

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from