Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 FEBRUARY 2013

Telus And Mason: Courts Are Concerned By "Empty Voting" But Cannot Stop It

For historical reasons, TELUS Corporation ("TELUS") had two classes of shares: common shares and non-voting shares.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

In TELUS Corporation v. Mason Capital Management LLC, 2012 BCCA 403, the Court of Appeal for British Columbia held that a shareholder does not have to be the beneficial owner of the shares held in order to requisition a shareholders' meeting pursuant to the British Columbia Business Corporations Act (the "BCBCA"), and that the right to requisition is not limited by the small size of a beneficial owner's net financial stake in the company.

For historical reasons, TELUS Corporation ("TELUS") had two classes of shares: common shares and non-voting shares. The non-voting shares traded at a slight discount relative to the common shares. TELUS proposed an arrangement to convert all non-voting shares to common shares on a one-to-one basis, which required a two-thirds majority vote in each share class. Following the announcement, the price differential between the common shares and the non-voting shares immediately narrowed.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from