Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 26 JUNE 2013

Regulation Of Defensive Tactics: A Possible Third Approach

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP has submitted a comment letter in response to the request for comment by the Canadian Securities Administrators with respect to proposed National Instrument 62-105 Security Holder Rights Plans, proposed Companion Policy 62-105CP Security Holder Rights Plans and proposed consequential amendments.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

McMillan LLP has today submitted a comment letter in response to the request for comment by the Canadian Securities Administrators (the "CSA") with respect to proposed National Instrument 62-105 Security Holder Rights Plans, proposed Companion Policy 62-105CP Security Holder Rights Plans and proposed consequential amendments (collectively, the "CSA Proposal"). The comment letter also responds to the consultation paper published concurrently by the Autorité des marchés financiers (the "AMF") on an alternative approach to the CSA Proposal (the "AMF Proposal").

In our submissions, we suggest an alternative approach to that of the AMF and CSA for the regulation of defensive tactics, which we believe may better address the critical policy concerns surrounding National Policy 62-202 Take-Over Bids – Defensive Tactics ("NP 62-202").1

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from