Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 APRIL 2025

Open Season? Reviewing Recent Decision In Binance Class Action

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

The recent Lochan v Binance Holdings Limited 2025 ONCA 221 decision from Ontario's Court of Appeal highlights potential theories of liability that crypto asset...

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

The recent Lochan v Binance Holdings Limited 2025 ONCA 221 decision from Ontario's Court of Appeal highlights potential theories of liability that crypto asset trading platforms ("CTPs") might face from users in class actions based on securities law prospectus requirements. While these theories remain untested on the merits, the Court held that they are not clearly doomed to fail and appear consistent with the investor protection purpose of securities law.

The Allegations

Binance never registered with the Ontario Securities Commission ("OSC") to engage in the business of trading in securities and did not file or deliver a prospectus to users who purchased cryptocurrency derivatives, which were contracts that derived their value based on the price movement of cryptocurrencies ("Cryptocurrency Derivatives"). Even though Binance discontinued operations in Ontario, it remains the target of an ongoing formal investigation by the OSC for, among other things,

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from