Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 JANUARY 2009

M&A Defensive Tactics: Using A Confidentiality Agreement To Stop A Hostile Takeover Bid

Torys
Torys
Contributor
Torys

Torys

Torys LLP is an international business law firm that works with clients who expect the best advice...

View firm profile
Explore more from Torys

On January 19, 2009, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice permanently prohibited Research In Motion's hostile bid to buy Certicom, on the basis of RIM's breaches of non-disclosure agreements.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

On January 19, 2009, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice permanently prohibited Research In Motion's hostile bid to buy Certicom, on the basis of RIM's breaches of non-disclosure agreements. The Court found that the confidentiality provisions of their non-disclosure agreements had the effect of a standstill provision and independently prevented the bidder from making its hostile bid. The ruling led RIM to withdraw its bid. Another suitor, VeriSign, has now entered into an agreement to buy Certicom on a friendly basis.

The Court's ruling highlights the significance of the specific wording of a confidentiality agreement and demonstrates the importance of purchasers considering their future plans when negotiating the terms of a confidentiality agreement and using confidential information provided by a target.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from