Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 FEBRUARY 2026

Lochan v. Binance Holdings Limited

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

The Plaintiffs were customers of Binance Holdings Limited ("Binance"), who operates a cryptocurrency trading platform.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Facts

The Plaintiffs were customers of Binance Holdings Limited ("Binance"), who operates a cryptocurrency trading platform. The Plaintiffs previously brought a class action seeking relief under the Ontario Securities Act against Binance for having sold securities without filing a prospectus or obtaining an exemption.

Binance had sought to stay the class action on the basis that its customers' user agreement contained an arbitration agreement requiring all disputes to be resolved by arbitration seated in Hong Kong and administered by the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre ("HKIAC"). The Ontario Superior Court, and the Court of Appeal, refused to grant the stay in favour of arbitration, finding that the arbitration agreement was void for being contrary to public policy and unconscionable. This was because its practical effect was to deny at least some of Binance's customers a realistically available forum to bring any claim due to the costs of bringing an

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from