Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 OCTOBER 2013

Lambert Settlement – Part 1

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

A recent settlement agreement between Anthony Lambert and the Alberta Securities Commission presents a cautionary tale for directors and officers of public companies who are considering trading in securities during the early stages of M&A activity.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Insider Trading in the Context of M&A Activity Part 1: A Cautionary Tale

A recent settlement agreement between Anthony Lambert ("Lambert") and the Alberta Securities Commission ("ASC") presents a cautionary tale for directors and officers of public companies who are considering trading in securities during the early stages of M&A activity. We'll discuss some of the key takeaways from this cautionary tale in our next post, but for now, here's an overview of the Lambert settlement.

In the settlement agreement, the ASC alleged that Lambert, then President and CEO of Daylight Energy Ltd. ("Daylight"), breached Alberta's securities laws and acted contrary to the public interest by purchasing Daylight's securities with knowledge of an undisclosed material fact – that Daylight had received an unsolicited expression of interest from Sinopec International Petroleum Exploration and Production Corporation ("SIPC") that discussed the possibility of "a major strategic

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from