Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MARCH 2018

Five Key M&A Cases From 2017 To Consider This Proxy Season

McCarthy Tétrault
McCarthy Tétrault
Contributor
McCarthy Tétrault

McCarthy Tétrault

Built on a unique model of collaboration, innovation and efficiency, McCarthy Tétrault delivers...

View firm profile
Explore more from McCarthy Tétrault

Most M&A lawyers believed that the fairness opinion relied upon by InterOil's board complied with industry norms.

CanadaCorporate/Commercial Law

Heading into the 2018 proxy season, we have summarized five Canadian M&A cases from 2017 and their potential impact. This article should be read together with our recent post summarizing some of 2017's most noteworthy developments in governance and disclosure requirements and guidelines.

#1. Residual uncertainty remains on the standard applicable to fairness opinions in plans of arrangement

On February 22, 2017, the Yukon Supreme Court ("YKSC") approved an amended plan of arrangement for InterOil Corporation ("InterOil") to be acquired by Exxon Mobil Corporation ("Exxon") ("InterOil #2").1 The YKSC decision leaves residual uncertainty that has persisted since the 2016 decision of the Yukon Court of Appeal ("YKCA") in InterOil Corporation v. Mulacek ("InterOil #1").2 InterOil #1 surprised many Canadian M&A lawyers because the YKCA reversed the lower court's approval of the original plan of arrangement notwithstanding the significant premium offered by Exxon and its

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from